From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tinsle v. Yatooma

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Mar 24, 2021
955 N.W.2d 895 (Mich. 2021)

Opinion

SC: 162041 COA: 349354

03-24-2021

Ronald TINSLEY, Van Buren Steel, Inc., and Van Buren Properties of Michigan, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Norman YATOOMA and Norman Yatooma & Associates, PC, Defendants-Appellees.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 13, 2020 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.


Summaries of

Tinsle v. Yatooma

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Mar 24, 2021
955 N.W.2d 895 (Mich. 2021)
Case details for

Tinsle v. Yatooma

Case Details

Full title:Ronald TINSLEY, Van Buren Steel, Inc., and Van Buren Properties of…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Mar 24, 2021

Citations

955 N.W.2d 895 (Mich. 2021)