From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tineo v. United States

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 13, 2021
19 CIVIL 9575 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 13, 2021)

Opinion

19 CIVIL 9575 (LTS) 05 CR. 00020-4 (LTS)

12-13-2021

SADIN TINEO, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Order dated December 13, 2021, Petitioner's motion brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 2255 is denied in its entirety. Petitioner may not appeal the Memorandum Order unless "a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability." 28 U.S.C.A. § 2253(c)(1) (Westlaw through P.L. 117- 57). A certificate will be granted "if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C.A. §2253(c)(2) (Westlaw through P.L. 117-57); see generally United States v. Perez, 129 F.3d 255, 259-60 (2d Cir. 1997) (discussing the standard for issuing a certificate of appealability). The Court finds that Petitioner will not be able to sustain this burden and has declined to issue a certificate of appealability. Furthermore, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Order would not be taken in good faith. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444 (1962); accordingly, case 19- CV-09575 is closed.


Summaries of

Tineo v. United States

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 13, 2021
19 CIVIL 9575 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 13, 2021)
Case details for

Tineo v. United States

Case Details

Full title:SADIN TINEO, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 13, 2021

Citations

19 CIVIL 9575 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 13, 2021)