From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Timken Co. v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jan 13, 2015
589 F. App'x 995 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

Opinion

2014-1454

01-13-2015

THE TIMKEN COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, NTN BEARING CORPORATION OF AMERICA, NTN-SNR ROULEMENTS S.A., AND SNR BEARINGS USA, INC., Defendants-Appellees, MYONIC GMBH, AND NEW HAMPSHIRE BALL BEARINGS, INC., Defendants, SCHAEFFLER ITALIA S.R.L., SKF USA INC., SKF INDUSTRIE S.P.A., AND SOMECAT S.P.A., Defendants-Appellees.

GEERT DE PREST, Stewart and Stewart, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were TERENCE P. STEWART and LANE S. HUREWITZ. Of counsel was WILLIAM ALFRED FENNELL. TARA K. HOGAN, Senior Trial Counsel, Civil Division, Commercial Litigation Branch, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee United States. With her on the brief were STUART F. DELERY, Assistant Attorney General, JEANNE E. DAVIDSON, Director, and REGINALD T. BLADES, JR., Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief was WHITNEY ROLIG, Office of the Chief Counsel for Trade Enforcement & Compliance, United States Department of Commerce. KEVIN O'BRIEN, Baker & McKenzie, of Chicago, Illinois, for defendants-appellees NTN Bearing Corporation of America, NTN-SNR Roulements S.A., and SNR Bearings USA, Inc. With him on the brief was DIANE MACDONALD. MAX F. SCHUTZMAN, Grunfeld, Desiderio, Lebowitz, Silverman & Klestadt LLP, of New York, New York, for defendant-appellee Schaeffler Italia S.R.L. With him on the brief were JOHN M. FOOTE and KAVITA MOHAN. Of counsel was ANDREW THOMAS SCHUTZ, of Washington, DC. CHRISTOPHER G. FALCONE, Steptoe & Johnson LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellees SKF USA Inc., SKF Industrie S.P.A., and Somecat S.P.A. With him on the brief was HERBERT C. SHELLEY.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Court of International Trade in No. 1:12-cv-00415-JAR, 1:12-cv-00416-JAR, 1:12-cv-00417-JAR, Judge Jane A. Restani.

JUDGMENT

GEERT DE PREST, Stewart and Stewart, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were TERENCE P. STEWART and LANE S. HUREWITZ. Of counsel was WILLIAM ALFRED FENNELL. TARA K. HOGAN, Senior Trial Counsel, Civil Division, Commercial Litigation Branch, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee United States. With her on the brief were STUART F. DELERY, Assistant Attorney General, JEANNE E. DAVIDSON, Director, and REGINALD T. BLADES, JR., Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief was WHITNEY ROLIG, Office of the Chief Counsel for Trade Enforcement & Compliance, United States Department of Commerce. KEVIN O'BRIEN, Baker & McKenzie, of Chicago, Illinois, for defendants-appellees NTN Bearing Corporation of America, NTN-SNR Roulements S.A., and SNR Bearings USA, Inc. With him on the brief was DIANE MACDONALD. MAX F. SCHUTZMAN, Grunfeld, Desiderio, Lebowitz, Silverman & Klestadt LLP, of New York, New York, for defendant-appellee Schaeffler Italia S.R.L. With him on the brief were JOHN M. FOOTE and KAVITA MOHAN. Of counsel was ANDREW THOMAS SCHUTZ, of Washington, DC. CHRISTOPHER G. FALCONE, Steptoe & Johnson LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellees SKF USA Inc., SKF Industrie S.P.A., and Somecat S.P.A. With him on the brief was HERBERT C. SHELLEY. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, MOORE, and CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT January 13, 2015

Date

/s/ Daniel. E. O'Toole

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Timken Co. v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jan 13, 2015
589 F. App'x 995 (Fed. Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Timken Co. v. United States

Case Details

Full title:THE TIMKEN COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, NTN BEARING…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jan 13, 2015

Citations

589 F. App'x 995 (Fed. Cir. 2015)