From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Timco v. Sterling Heights Police Dep't

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jul 18, 2023
No. 23-11239 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 18, 2023)

Opinion

23-11239

07-18-2023

KYLE JORDAN TIMCO, Plaintiff, v. STERLING HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER REQUIRING CLARIFICATION REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S INTENT TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS HIS CLAIMS

NANCY G. EDMUNDS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff Kyle Jordan Timco's underlying complaint was first filed on May 12, 2023. The complaint was docketed as case no. 23-11132 and upon the Court's initial review, it was summarily dismissed. (Case No. 23-11132, ECF No. 6.) On May 25, 2023, Plaintiff refiled the same complaint along with a pleading entitled “Continuation of Complaint & Reasons for accepting jurisdiction” and a number of documents that provide additional information regarding his claims. (ECF No. 1.) The new pleadings were docketed as a separate case and assigned the above-captioned case number. Plaintiff, however, includes the first case number in the filing and appears to view it as an amendment of the original complaint. (Id. at PageID.13-14.) The Court has not yet conducted its initial screening of the refiled complaint. On June 22, 2023, Plaintiff filed a “motion to withdraw” in case no. 23-11132, stating that “I find it in my best interest at this time not to move forward against these parties listed above.” (Case No. 23-11132, ECF No. 9.) The parties listed in the caption of that motion are the same parties listed in this case, particularly in the caption of the “Continuation of Complaint” document. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), a plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment. Thus, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall, within ten (10) days of the date of this order, clarify in writing whether he intends to voluntarily dismiss his claims within the context of this case as well. Failure to respond to the Court's order may result in the dismissal of this case under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). If Plaintiff indicates a desire to proceed with this case, the Court will then undertake an initial review of the pleadings.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Timco v. Sterling Heights Police Dep't

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jul 18, 2023
No. 23-11239 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 18, 2023)
Case details for

Timco v. Sterling Heights Police Dep't

Case Details

Full title:KYLE JORDAN TIMCO, Plaintiff, v. STERLING HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT, et…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Jul 18, 2023

Citations

No. 23-11239 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 18, 2023)