From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tidelands Bank v. J.R. Gregory Ventures, LLC

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Aug 12, 2015
2015-UP-398 (S.C. Ct. App. Aug. 12, 2015)

Opinion

2015-UP-398

08-12-2015

Tidelands Bank, Respondent, v. J.R. Gregory Ventures, LLC, Marilyn T. Schmitt and The Meridian Owners Association, Inc., Defendants, Of whom J.R. Gregory Ventures, LLC and Marilyn T. Schmitt are the Appellants. v. Appellate Case No. 2014-001733

Peter Gerard McGrath and Matthew Evan Pecoy, both of McGrath Law Firm, PA, of Mount Pleasant, for Appellants. W. Gregory Pearce, Sr. and Joseph Timothy Belton, both of Moore & Van Allen, PLLC, of Charleston, for Respondent.


Unpublished Opinion

Submitted July 1, 2015

Appeal From Charleston County Mikell R. Scarborough, Master-in-Equity

Peter Gerard McGrath and Matthew Evan Pecoy, both of McGrath Law Firm, PA, of Mount Pleasant, for Appellants.

W. Gregory Pearce, Sr. and Joseph Timothy Belton, both of Moore & Van Allen, PLLC, of Charleston, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Fleming v. Rose, 350 S.C. 488, 493, 567 S.E.2d 857, 860 (2002) ("When reviewing the grant of summary judgment, the appellate court applies the same standard applied by the trial court pursuant to Rule 56(c), SCRCP."); id. ("Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine issue of material fact such that the moving party must prevail as a matter of law."); TranSouth Fin. Corp. v. Cochran, 324 S.C. 290, 294, 478 S.E.2d 63, 65 (Ct. App. 1996) ("A guaranty is a contract and should be construed based on the language used by the parties to express their intention."); Klutts Resort Realty, Inc. v. Down'Round Dev. Corp., 268 S.C. 80, 87-88, 232 S.E.2d 20, 24 (1977) (stating an individual who executes a corporate contract that contains a personal promise is not relieved from personal liability by adding to his name a term such as "director, " "president, " or a similar title); id. at 90, 232 S.E.2d at 25 ("To relieve the signer personally it must appear from the whole instrument or competent testimony, where parol evidence is admissible, that the instrument was intended to be the contract of the principal and not that of the agent.").

AFFIRMED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

SHORT, LOCKEMY, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Tidelands Bank v. J.R. Gregory Ventures, LLC

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Aug 12, 2015
2015-UP-398 (S.C. Ct. App. Aug. 12, 2015)
Case details for

Tidelands Bank v. J.R. Gregory Ventures, LLC

Case Details

Full title:Tidelands Bank, Respondent, v. J.R. Gregory Ventures, LLC, Marilyn T…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Aug 12, 2015

Citations

2015-UP-398 (S.C. Ct. App. Aug. 12, 2015)