From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tichenor v. Tichenor

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 18, 1977
342 So. 2d 845 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Opinion

No. 76-974.

February 18, 1977. Rehearing Denied March 18, 1977.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Pinellas County, David F. Patterson, J.

Leonard Lubin, St. Petersburg, for appellant.

Lawrence E. Lyman, St. Petersburg, for appellee.


In this dissolution proceeding the appellant has failed to show that the periodic alimony and child support awards were beyond the ambit of judicial discretion. However, appellant's third point has merit and requires a modification of the judgment.

About two weeks before the parties separated, certain steel buildings were purchased for $19,000 and put in the name of the appellant. Pursuant to the rationale of Toby v. Toby, 280 So.2d 523 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973), and on the premise that the purchase money came from a joint account, the court determined that the appellee was entitled to be reimbursed for one-half the cost of the buildings. Yet, the record only shows that $3,400 of the purchase price came from joint funds. Therefore, the appellee's equitable lien against these buildings must be reduced from $9,500 to $1,700.

The judgment is affirmed as modified herein.

McNULTY, Acting C.J., and GRIMES and OTT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Tichenor v. Tichenor

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 18, 1977
342 So. 2d 845 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)
Case details for

Tichenor v. Tichenor

Case Details

Full title:RONALD STEWART TICHENOR, APPELLANT, v. RABUN N. TICHENOR, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Mar 18, 1977

Citations

342 So. 2d 845 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Citing Cases

McClung v. McClung

We now hold likewise that when the separate property, or funds constituting separate property, of one spouse…