From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tibbetts v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI
Oct 27, 2015
Case No. 1:14-cv-602 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 27, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 1:14-cv-602

10-27-2015

RAYMOND TIBBETTS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent.



Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (ECF No. 31), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, Warden's Renewed Motion to Dismiss in Light of Glossip v. Gross (ECF No. 22) is DENIED. October 27, 2015.

/s/_________

Susan J. Dlott

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Tibbetts v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI
Oct 27, 2015
Case No. 1:14-cv-602 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 27, 2015)
Case details for

Tibbetts v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND TIBBETTS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI

Date published: Oct 27, 2015

Citations

Case No. 1:14-cv-602 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 27, 2015)