Summary
concluding that the case should be remanded in pertinent part because the ALJ failed to address inconsistent evidence indicating that the plaintiff's migraine headaches may cause functional limitations
Summary of this case from Williams v. ColvinOpinion
No. 5:15-CV-290-FL
09-09-2016
JUDGMENT
Decision by Court.
This action came before the Honorable Louise W. Flanagan, United States District Judge, for consideration of the parties' cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings and the memorandum and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, to which no objections were filed. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED in accordance with the court's order entered September 9, 2016, and for the reasons set forth more specifically therein, that plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted and defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied. This matter is remanded to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the memorandum and recommendation. This Judgment Filed and Entered on September 9 , 2016, and Copies To:
Lisa M. Rayo (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing)
Charlotte Williams Hall (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing) September 9, 2016
JULIE RICHARDS JOHNSTON, CLERK
/s/ Christa N. Baker
(By) Christa N. Baker, Deputy Clerk