From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Throop v. Woodford

United States District Court, S.D. California
Oct 5, 2007
CASE NO.: 06-CV-02376-JAH (NLS) (S.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2007)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 06-CV-02376-JAH (NLS).

October 5, 2007


ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER OR RESPONSIVE PLEADING


Defendants Albritton, Alvarez, Barber, Bell, Burkhammer, Castillo, Dowling-Smith, Diaz, Gentry, Giurbino, Grady, Janda, D.C. Johnson, R. Johnson, Leamons, Meadors, Medina, Morales, Nunez, Ochoa, Parrilla, Sampson, Schaller, Scribner, Silva, Stratton, Sullivan, Tamayo, Traynham, Tyree, Verdin, Witcher, and Woodford have applied for an extension of time to file an answer or responsive pleading to the Complaint.

Good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time by which an answer or responsive pleading is required is extended to December 7, 2007.


Summaries of

Throop v. Woodford

United States District Court, S.D. California
Oct 5, 2007
CASE NO.: 06-CV-02376-JAH (NLS) (S.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2007)
Case details for

Throop v. Woodford

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD ANTHONY THROOP, Plaintiff, v. JEANNE WOODFORD, Director, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. California

Date published: Oct 5, 2007

Citations

CASE NO.: 06-CV-02376-JAH (NLS) (S.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2007)