From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thrasher v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 4, 2013
Case No. 1:12-cv-151 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 4, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:12-cv-151

03-04-2013

Andrew Thrasher, Plaintiff v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed February 6, 2013 (Doc. 16).

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). As of the date of this Order, no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, we find the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation correct.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and REMANDED pursuant to Sentence Four U.S.C. § 405(g).

______________________

Sandra S. Beckwith, Senior Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Thrasher v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 4, 2013
Case No. 1:12-cv-151 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 4, 2013)
Case details for

Thrasher v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:Andrew Thrasher, Plaintiff v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 4, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:12-cv-151 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 4, 2013)

Citing Cases

Allen v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

To satisfy her heightened duty to develop the record, the ALJ must “scrupulously and conscientiously probe…