From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thrash v. McDaniel

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Sep 30, 2014
578 F. App'x 619 (8th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

No. 14-2534

09-30-2014

Anthony Thrash Plaintiff - Appellant v. Dustin McDaniel, in his individual and official capacity as Arkansas State Attorney General; Jim Hannah, Chief Justice, Arkansas Supreme Court; Karen R. Baker, Justice, Arkansas Supreme Court; Donald L. Corbin, Justice, Arkansas Supreme Court; Paul E. Danielson, Justice, Arkansas Supreme Court; Courtney Hudson-Goodson, Justice, Arkansas Supreme Court; Josephine L. Hart, Justice, Arkansas Supreme Court; Cliff Hoofman, Justice, Arkansas Supreme Court Defendants - Appellees


Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock [Unpublished] Before LOKEN, MELLOY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

Arkansas prisoner Anthony Thrash appeals the district court's preservice dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action challenging Arkansas's procedures for issuing writs of error coram nobis. Following careful review of the record and Thrash's brief, we conclude that, for the reasons explained in the district court's order, the court did not err in dismissing the action for failure to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A(b), 1915(e)(2)(B); Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (de novo review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

The Honorable Kristine G. Baker, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.


Summaries of

Thrash v. McDaniel

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Sep 30, 2014
578 F. App'x 619 (8th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

Thrash v. McDaniel

Case Details

Full title:Anthony Thrash Plaintiff - Appellant v. Dustin McDaniel, in his individual…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

Date published: Sep 30, 2014

Citations

578 F. App'x 619 (8th Cir. 2014)

Citing Cases

Walker v. Siebrasse

"Although pro se complaints are to be liberally construed, the complaint must allege specific facts…

Walker v. Rabern

"Although pro se complaints are to be liberally construed, the complaint must allege specific facts…