From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thorson v. New York City Transit Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 27, 2003
305 A.D.2d 666 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-06362

Submitted May 7, 2003.

May 27, 2003.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated June 3, 2002, which denied his motion to quash a subpoena issued to a nonparty, Juan Cortes, directing him to appear for a deposition.

Bert Taras, Old Westbury, N.Y. for appellant.

Wallace D. Gossett, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Lawrence Heisler of counsel), for respondent.

Before: ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, THOMAS A. ADAMS, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiff's motion to quash the subpoena issued to Juan Cortes. The defendant demonstrated that Cortes has information that is material and necessary to the defense of this action (see CPLR 3101[a][4]), and that this information is otherwise unobtainable (see O'Neill v. Oakgrove Constr., 71 N.Y.2d 521, 526; Abbadessa v. Sprint, 291 A.D.2d 363; Bostrum v. William Penn Life Ins. Co. of N.Y., 285 A.D.2d 482; Maxwell v. Snapper, Inc., 249 A.D.2d 374; Dioguardi v. St. John's Riverside Hosp., 144 A.D.2d 333).

FLORIO, J.P., S. MILLER, FRIEDMANN, ADAMS and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Thorson v. New York City Transit Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 27, 2003
305 A.D.2d 666 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Thorson v. New York City Transit Auth

Case Details

Full title:PAUL THORSON, appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 27, 2003

Citations

305 A.D.2d 666 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
759 N.Y.S.2d 880

Citing Cases

Tuebner v. Cardinal Health 414, Inc.

Katz, 55 AD3d 680, 683, 867 NYS2d 100; Moran v McCarthy, Safrath Carbone, PC, 31 AD3d 725, 726, 819 NYS2d…

Kooper v. Kooper

other sources ( id. at 359; see Reich v Reich, 36 AD3d 506, 507). Subsequent to Dioguardi, many of our cases…