From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thornton v. Harper

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Apr 13, 2004
131 S.W.3d 429 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

No. WD 61571

April 13, 2004

Appeal from the Circuit Court of DeKalb County, Missouri, Honorable Richard B. Elliott, Judge.

William E. Shull, Jr., Esq., Attorney for Appellant — Liberty, MO.

George E. Proctor, Jr., Esq., Attorney for Respondent — Kansas City, MO.

Before Smith, P.J., Holliger and Hardwick, JJ.


ORDER


Louin Thornton obtained a $19,911 judgment for unjust enrichment against Andy Harper, d/b/a Harper's Logging. Harper appeals, contending the trial court erroneously applied the law in allowing recovery under an unjust enrichment theory and that the judgment is unsupported by substantial evidence. Upon review of the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. The parties have been provided with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Thornton v. Harper

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Apr 13, 2004
131 S.W.3d 429 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Thornton v. Harper

Case Details

Full title:LOUIN THORNTON, Respondent v. ANDY W. HARPER, Appellant

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District

Date published: Apr 13, 2004

Citations

131 S.W.3d 429 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)