From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thornton v. Comerica Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 23, 2011
Case No. 11-13787 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 23, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 11-13787

09-23-2011

DEJUAN THORNTON, Plaintiff, v. COMERICA BANK, Defendant.


Honorable David M. Lawson

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

The plaintiff, a federal prisoner currently confined at the Administrative Maximum facility in Florence, Colorado, filed a pro se complaint seeking to access his bank account with defendant Comerica Bank. The plaintiff did not pay the filing fee, and instead instructed that the filing fee should be paid from the bank account at issue in this case. A Notice of Filing Fee Not Paid was issued on September 6, 2011. This Notice informed the plaintiff that he must pay the filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis within seven calendar days of the Notice or risk the dismissal of his complaint. On September 8, 2011, this Court ordered the plaintiff to show cause on or before September 13, 2011 why his case should not be dismissed for a failure to pay the filing fee. On September 19, the plaintiff filed his response to the Court's order to show cause in which he reiterated his request that the filing fee be paid from the bank account at issue in this case.

This Court has no authority to order that a filing fee be paid by a party other than the party filing a complaint with the Court. Further, the Court has no authority to direct that a filing fee be paid from a specified bank account, especially the disputed bank account in the custody of the defendant. The plaintiff did not pay the filing fee by the date ordered, nor has he applied for leave to file in forma pauperis. He must do one or the other within the time prescribed by the Court. See Searcy v. County of Oakland, 735 F. Supp. 2d 759, 765-68 (E.D. Mich. 2010). Because the Court cannot order the defendant to pay the plaintiff's filing, regardless of the source of the funds (which is in dispute), and the plaintiff has not complied with the Court's show cause order, the Court must dismiss this complaint without prejudice. The plaintiff is free to refile the complaint upon payment of the filing fee or application for leave to file in forma pauperis.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on September 23, 2011.

DEBORAH R. TOFIL


Summaries of

Thornton v. Comerica Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 23, 2011
Case No. 11-13787 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 23, 2011)
Case details for

Thornton v. Comerica Bank

Case Details

Full title:DEJUAN THORNTON, Plaintiff, v. COMERICA BANK, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 23, 2011

Citations

Case No. 11-13787 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 23, 2011)