From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thorns v. Shannon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 3, 2013
No. 2:11-cv-01826 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-01826 MCE DAD P

04-03-2013

BRUCE THORNS, Plaintiff, v. S. SHANNON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 28, 2013, the assigned District Judge adopted findings and recommendations issued by the undersigned and granted defendants' motion for summary judgment as to plaintiff's equal protection claim. Plaintiff was, however, granted leave to file an amended complaint to attempt to allege other constitutional claims, if any, as to defendants Virga, Shannon and Baker. By this order, the court will set a deadline for the filing of plaintiff's amended complaint.

If plaintiff elects to file an amended complaint, he must allege facts therein demonstrating how the conditions complained of resulted in a deprivation of his federal constitutional or statutory rights. See Ellis v. Cassidy, 625 F.2d 227 (9th Cir. 1980). The amended complaint must allege in specific terms how each named defendant was involved in the deprivation of plaintiff's rights. There can be no liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 unless there is some affirmative link or connection between a defendant's actions and the claimed deprivation. Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362 (1976); May v. Enomoto, 633 F.2d 164, 167 (9th Cir. 1980); Johnson v. Duffy, 588 F.2d 740, 743 (9th Cir. 1978). Vague and conclusory allegations of official participation in civil rights violations are not sufficient. Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982).

Plaintiff is also informed that the court cannot refer to a prior pleading in order to make plaintiff's amended complaint complete. Local Rule 220 requires that an amended complaint be complete in itself without reference to any prior pleading. This is because, as a general rule, an amended complaint supersedes the original complaint. See Loux v. Rhay, 375 F.2d 55, 57 (9th Cir. 1967). Once plaintiff files an amended complaint, the original pleading no longer serves any function in the case. Therefore, in an amended complaint, as in an original complaint, each claim and the involvement of each defendant must be sufficiently alleged.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of service of this order to file an amended complaint that complies with the requirements of the Civil Rights Act, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules of Practice; the amended complaint must bear the docket number assigned to this case and must be labeled "Amended Complaint"; plaintiff shall use the form complaint provided by the Clerk of the Court; failure to file an amended complaint in accordance with this order will result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice; and

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to provide plaintiff with the court's form complaint for a § 1983 action.

_______________

DALE A. DROZD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Thorns v. Shannon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 3, 2013
No. 2:11-cv-01826 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2013)
Case details for

Thorns v. Shannon

Case Details

Full title:BRUCE THORNS, Plaintiff, v. S. SHANNON, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 3, 2013

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-01826 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2013)