From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thorne v. Francis Financial, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 1, 2021
21 Civ. 3607 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 1, 2021)

Opinion

21 Civ. 3607 (ER)

06-01-2021

BRAULIO THORNE, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. FRANCIS FINANCIAL, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

RAMOS, D.J.

Te Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled, it is ORDERED, that the above-entitled action be and hereby is discontinued, without costs to either party, subject to reopening should the settlement not be consummated within thirty (30) days of the date hereof.

Any application to reopen must be fled within thirty (30) days of this Order; any application to reopen fled thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, the parties are advised that if they wish the Court to retain jurisdiction in this matter for purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the next thirty (30) days with a request that the agreement be “so ordered” by the Court.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Thorne v. Francis Financial, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 1, 2021
21 Civ. 3607 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Thorne v. Francis Financial, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BRAULIO THORNE, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 1, 2021

Citations

21 Civ. 3607 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 1, 2021)