From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. Wood Edge Pointe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Feb 15, 2013
NO. 1:12-CV-00785 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 15, 2013)

Opinion

NO. 1:12-CV-00785

02-15-2013

JOANN THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. WOOD EDGE POINTE., et al., Defendants.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (doc. 4), to which there were no objections. The Magistrate Judge recommended the Court dismiss this matter for lack of prosecution.

Proper Notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). As of the date of this Order, no objections have been filed.

Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court finds the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation thorough, well-reasoned, and correct.

Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS and AFFIRMS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (doc. 4) in all respects, and DISMISSES this matter with prejudice for lack of prosecution. The Court further CERTIFIES pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that an appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith. McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601 (6th Cir. 1997).

SO ORDERED.

_______________

S. Arthur Spiegel

United States Senior District Judge


Summaries of

Thompson v. Wood Edge Pointe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Feb 15, 2013
NO. 1:12-CV-00785 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 15, 2013)
Case details for

Thompson v. Wood Edge Pointe

Case Details

Full title:JOANN THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. WOOD EDGE POINTE., et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 15, 2013

Citations

NO. 1:12-CV-00785 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 15, 2013)