Thompson v. Thompson (In re Partitioning Prop. of Thompson)

Full title: IN THE MATTER OF PARTITIONING THE PROPERTY OF SKYE DONALD DAYTON THOMPSON…

Court: United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Oxford Division

Date published: Aug 23, 2021

Civil Action 3:21cv121-DBM-JMV (N.D. Miss. Aug. 23, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 3:21cv121-DBM-JMV

08-23-2021

IN THE MATTER OF PARTITIONING THE PROPERTY OF SKYE DONALD DAYTON THOMPSON AND ROMY LYNN THOMPSON v. ROMY LYNN THOMPSON DEFENDANT/THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFF SKYE DONALD DAYTON THOMPSON PLAINTIFF v. SHELDON THOMPSON AND MARIE-MERCED THOMPSON THIRD PARTY DEFENDANTS

THOMAS J. SUSZEK, MSB #8079, Counsel for Plaintiff and Third Party Defendants ELIZABETH PENN, MSB #102116 Counsel for Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff

JANE M. VIRDEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

THOMAS J. SUSZEK, MSB #8079, Counsel for Plaintiff and Third Party Defendants

ELIZABETH PENN, MSB #102116 Counsel for Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff

STIPULATION AND ORDER PURSUANT TOFEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 502(d) AND 502(e)

JANE M. VIRDEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED pursuant to Fed.R.Evid. 502(e), by and between Skye Donald Dayton Thompson, Romy Lynn Thompson, Sheldon Thompson and Marie-Merced Thompson, by and through their undersigned counsel, that:

In accordance with Fed.R.Evid. 502(d), except where a party intentionally waives attorney-client privilege or work product protection by disclosing such information to an adverse party as provided in Fed.R.Evid. 502(a), the disclosure of attorney-client privileged or work product protected information does not constitute a waiver in this proceeding, or in any other federal or state proceeding. Further, the provisions of Fed.R.Evid. 502(b)(2) and (3) are inapplicable to the production of such unintentionally disclosed ESI.

Where a party produces attorney-client privileged or work product protected information to an adverse party without intending to waive the privilege or protection, the producing party will notify the adversary that it did not intend a waiver by its disclosure, and the receiving party will promptly return the electronically stored information and/or paper document(s), and any copies thereof.

Any dispute regarding whether the disclosing party has asserted properly the attorney-client privilege or work product protection will be brought promptly to the Court, if the parties are not themselves able to resolve it.

IT IS SO STIPULATED, through Counsel of Record.

SO ORDERED.