Thompson v. State

Full title: LAWRENCE EDWARD THOMPSON, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston

Date published: Sep 8, 2005

Nos. 14-05-00884-CR, 14-05-00885-CR, 14-05-00886-CR, 14-05-00887-CR, 14-05-00888-CR, 14-05-00889-CR, 14-05-00890-CR, 14-05-00891-CR, 14-05-00892-CR, 14-05-00893-CR, 14-05-00894-CR, 14-05-00895-CR, 14-05-00896-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 8, 2005)

Opinion

Nos. 14-05-00884-CR, 14-05-00885-CR, 14-05-00886-CR, 14-05-00887-CR, 14-05-00888-CR, 14-05-00889-CR, 14-05-00890-CR, 14-05-00891-CR, 14-05-00892-CR, 14-05-00893-CR, 14-05-00894-CR, 14-05-00895-CR, 14-05-00896-CR

Memorandum Opinion filed September 8, 2005. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.2(b).

On Appeal from the 248th District Court, Harris County, Texas, Trial Court Cause Nos. 1036822; 1036823; 1036821; 1036824; 1036825; 1036826; 1036827; 1036828; 1036829; 1036830; 1036831; 1036832; 1036833. Dismissed.

Panel consists of Justices HUDSON, FROST, and SEYMORE.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

In each of these causes, the trial court held appellant in direct contempt and on August 10, 2005, signed judgments of contempt and commitment orders. Appellant filed pro se notices of appeal on August 16, 2005. Contempt judgments are not appealable. In re Long, 984 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex. 1999); Wead v. State, 94 S.W.3d 131, 139 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 2002), rev'd on other grounds, 129 S.W.3d 126 (Tex.Crim.App. 2004). Thus, we have no jurisdiction to entertain these appeals. Accordingly, the appeals are ordered dismissed.