From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 17, 2007
969 So. 2d 1223 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Summary

holding the trial court's failure to instruct on a lesser-included offense was not preserved for review when the defendant did not request such an instruction and did not object to the instructions as given

Summary of this case from Burns v. State

Opinion

No. 1D06-5237.

December 17, 2007.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Duval County, L.P. Haddock, J.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Carl S. McGinnes, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Joshua R. Heller and Bryan Jordan, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


This is an appeal of a judgment and sentence for discharging a firearm from a vehicle within 1000 feet of a person, in violation of section 790.15(2), Florida Statutes (2005). Appellant contends the trial court committed reversible error in two respects: (1) by failing to instruct the jury on a lesser-included offense, and (2) by sentencing him without renewing the offer of appointed counsel and without securing a waiver of counsel.

Appellant did not request an instruction on criminal mischief as a lesser-included offense and did not object to the instructions as given. Accordingly, the trial court's failure to instruct on a lesser-included offense is not preserved for review. McKinney v. State, 579 So.2d 80 (Fla. 1991).

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.111(d)(5) clearly mandates that the trial court renew its offer to appoint counsel at the sentencing stage of the trial. Because the trial court did not inquire as to whether the appellant desired counsel at the sentencing hearing, we are compelled to vacate the sentence imposed and remand this cause to the trial court for resentencing, prior to which an offer of assistance of counsel shall be made by the trial judge. Billions v. State, 399 So.2d 1086, 1087 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

BARFIELD, WOLF, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Thompson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 17, 2007
969 So. 2d 1223 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

holding the trial court's failure to instruct on a lesser-included offense was not preserved for review when the defendant did not request such an instruction and did not object to the instructions as given

Summary of this case from Burns v. State
Case details for

Thompson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Alvin THOMPSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Dec 17, 2007

Citations

969 So. 2d 1223 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Citing Cases

Burns v. State

To preserve such an error for appellate review, the defendant must request such an instruction and object to…

Barrientos v. State

We note that even a complete failure to instruct the jury on the applicable lesser included offenses in this…