From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Sep 1, 2015
468 S.W.3d 909 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. ED 101558

09-01-2015

Dejuan Thompson, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Srikant Chigurupati, 1010 Market St., Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant. Chris Koster, Robert J. (Jeff) Bartholomew, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, for respondent.


Srikant Chigurupati, 1010 Market St., Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.

Chris Koster, Robert J. (Jeff) Bartholomew, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, for respondent.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Roy L. Richter, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Dejuan Thompson appeals from the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Thompson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Sep 1, 2015
468 S.W.3d 909 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

Thompson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Dejuan Thompson, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Date published: Sep 1, 2015

Citations

468 S.W.3d 909 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)