From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Jun 19, 2012
369 S.W.3d 86 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. ED 97275.

2012-06-19

Foster M. THOMPSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, 1122–CC01601, Margaret M. Neill. Gwenda Renee' Robinson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Robert J. Bartholomew, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, 1122–CC01601, Margaret M. Neill.


Gwenda Renee' Robinson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Robert J. Bartholomew, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before: CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

Movant, Foster M. Thompson, appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Thompson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Jun 19, 2012
369 S.W.3d 86 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Thompson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Foster M. THOMPSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Date published: Jun 19, 2012

Citations

369 S.W.3d 86 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Citing Cases

Thompson v. Russell

State v. Thompson, 330 S.W.3d 869, 870 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011); [ECF No. 10 Ex. 2]. Petitioner then filed a pro…