From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Aug 26, 2021
324 So. 3d 69 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1D20-2278

08-26-2021

Lavar THOMPSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Lavar Thompson, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Lavar Thompson, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits. See Topps v. State , 865 So. 2d 1253, 1258 (Fla. 2004) (explaining that a decision on an extraordinary writ petition that "clearly shows that the issue was considered by the court on the merits" is deemed a decision "which would later bar the litigant from presenting the issue under the doctrines of res judicata or collateral estoppel").

Ray, Makar, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Thompson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Aug 26, 2021
324 So. 3d 69 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Thompson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Lavar THOMPSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Aug 26, 2021

Citations

324 So. 3d 69 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)