From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. Mayorkas

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 13, 2022
2:21-06710 ODW (ADS) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-06710 ODW (ADS)

01-13-2022

Thompson v. Mayorkas, et al.


Present: Honorable Autumn D. Spaeth, United States Magistrate Judge.

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

On August 19, 2021, Plaintiff Stephanie L. Thompson filed a civil rights complaint pursuant 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Dkt. No. 1.) On December 2, 2021, Plaintiff served the defendants with certain documents. (Dkt. No. 12.) The defendants' answer was due January 3, 2022. (See id.) As of the date of this order, no answer has been filed, and Plaintiff has failed to request entry of default pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) (“Rule 55(a)”).

Accordingly, Plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Plaintiff may respond to this order (1) by filing a written response explaining why she has failed to prosecute this case or (2) by requesting that the clerk of court enter default pursuant to Rule 55(a). Plaintiff's response is due by January 27, 2022.

Plaintiff is expressly warned that failure to timely file a response to this order may result in a recommendation to the District Judge that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and obey court orders pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Thompson v. Mayorkas

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 13, 2022
2:21-06710 ODW (ADS) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2022)
Case details for

Thompson v. Mayorkas

Case Details

Full title:Thompson v. Mayorkas, et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jan 13, 2022

Citations

2:21-06710 ODW (ADS) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2022)