From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. Ireland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 21, 2014
C.A. No. 13-150 Erie (W.D. Pa. Aug. 21, 2014)

Opinion

C.A. No. 13-150 Erie

08-21-2014

KEITH THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. IRELAND, et al, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM ORDER

This prisoner civil rights action was received by the Clerk of Court on June 5, 2013, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation, issued on July 25, 2014, recommended that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, or In the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment [20] be granted and that this case be dismissed. Service was made on Plaintiff by mail at FCI Schuylkill, where he is incarcerated, and on Defendants. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the report and recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 21st Day of August, 2014;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, or In the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment [20] is GRANTED and that this case is DISMISSED. The report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, issued July 25, 2014, is adopted as the opinion of the court

8-21-14

/s/_________

MARK R. HORNAK

United States District Judge
cc: Susan Paradise Baxter

U.S. Magistrate Judge

all parties of record ___


Summaries of

Thompson v. Ireland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 21, 2014
C.A. No. 13-150 Erie (W.D. Pa. Aug. 21, 2014)
Case details for

Thompson v. Ireland

Case Details

Full title:KEITH THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. IRELAND, et al, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 21, 2014

Citations

C.A. No. 13-150 Erie (W.D. Pa. Aug. 21, 2014)

Citing Cases

McMillan v. Hughes

One incident of verbal harassment by corrections officers is insufficient to constitute government action…

Lingenfelter v. Liptak

Moreover, a single incident of verbal harassment by a corrections officer regarding an inmate's religion,…