From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. Hood, Commissioner of Banks

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1932
166 S.E. 927 (N.C. 1932)

Opinion

(Filed 2 November, 1932.)

Appeal and Error J c — Findings of fact are conclusive when supported by evidence.

The findings of fact by the referee, approved by the trial court, and supported by the evidence are conclusive on appeal.

APPEAL by plaintiff from Barnhill, J., at August Term, 1932, of ORANGE. Affirmed.

S. M. Gattis, Jr., for plaintiff.

Graham Sawyer for defendant.


This is an action to recover judgment for the amount due plaintiff by the Bank of Efland, which is now insolvent and in the hands of defendant for liquidation. The action was heard upon plaintiff's exceptions to the report of the referee. These exceptions were not sustained. The report was confirmed in all respects.

From judgment in accordance with the report of the referee, the plaintiff appealed to the Supreme Court.


There was sufficient evidence at the trial of this action to support the findings of fact made by the referee, and approved by the judge. These findings of fact are, therefore, conclusive.

"It is settled by all the decisions on the subject, with none to the contrary, that the findings of fact, made by a referee, and approved by the trial judge, are not subject to review on appeal, if they are supported by any competent evidence." Kenney v. Hotel Co., 194 N.C. 44, 138 S.E. 349.

The judgment upon the facts set out in the report of the referee, is

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Thompson v. Hood, Commissioner of Banks

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1932
166 S.E. 927 (N.C. 1932)
Case details for

Thompson v. Hood, Commissioner of Banks

Case Details

Full title:W. E. THOMPSON v. GURNEY P. HOOD, COMMISSIONER OF BANKS

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Nov 1, 1932

Citations

166 S.E. 927 (N.C. 1932)
203 N.C. 851