Opinion
3:21-cv-01448-SAL
02-02-2022
Robert E. Thompson, Lela T. Smoak, Plaintiffs, v. H. David Hammonds, James L. Hammons, Carolyn Hammons, Magistrate Scott Whittle, Defendants.
ORDER
SHERRI A. LYDON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This matter is before the court for review of Report and Recommendation (the “Report”) of United States Magistrate Paige J. Gossett, made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Civil Rule 73.02(B)(2) (D.S.C). [ECF No. 10.] The Report recommends dismissal of this case for Plaintiffs' failure to comply with a court order and failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Id. at 1-2. No. party filed objections to the Report, and the time to do so has expired.
The Magistrate Judge makes only a recommendation to this court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight, and the responsibility to make a final determination remains with this court. See Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270-71 (1976). The court is charged with making a de novo determination of only those portions of the Report that have been specifically objected to, and the court may accept, reject, or modify the Report, in whole or in part. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In the absence of objections, the court is not required to provide an explanation for adopting the Report and must “only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005) (citing Fed.R.Civ.P. 72 advisory committee's note).
After a thorough review of the Report, the applicable law, and the record of this case in accordance with the above standard, the court finds no clear error, adopts the Report, ECF No. 10, and incorporates the Report by reference herein. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED, without prejudice, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED.