From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. Dublin Police Servs.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 25, 2024
24-cv-00475-DMR (N.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2024)

Opinion

24-cv-00475-DMR

04-25-2024

MICHEAL THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. DUBLIN POLICE SERVICES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SERVICE OF COMPLAINT

DONNA M. RYU CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Micheal Thompson filed the complaint on January 25, 2024. It appears that the summons and complaint have not yet been served on Defendants. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), the court must dismiss an action without prejudice if a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed. Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to show cause in writing by no later than May 2, 2024 why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to serve the summons and complaint on Defendants.

The Initial Case Management Conference scheduled for May 1, 2024 is VACATED. The court will reschedule the case management conference as appropriate.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Thompson v. Dublin Police Servs.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 25, 2024
24-cv-00475-DMR (N.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2024)
Case details for

Thompson v. Dublin Police Servs.

Case Details

Full title:MICHEAL THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. DUBLIN POLICE SERVICES, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Apr 25, 2024

Citations

24-cv-00475-DMR (N.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2024)