From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. C&H Sugar Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 18, 2015
No. 2:13-cv-1869-MCE-EFB PS (E.D. Cal. May. 18, 2015)

Opinion

No. 2:13-cv-1869-MCE-EFB PS

05-18-2015

WILLIE MAE THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. C&H SUGAR COMPANY, INC., Defendant.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

This action, in which plaintiff is proceeding in propria persona, was referred to the undersigned under Local Rule 302(c)(21), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On March 30, 2015, the assigned district judge adopted this court's March 3, 2015 findings and recommendations. That order dismissed plaintiff's original complaint with leave to amend as to certain claims. The order gave plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint and warned plaintiff that failure to file an amended complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. ECF No. 19.

The deadline has passed and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the order.

Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed, and that the Clerk be directed to close this case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: May 18, 2015.

/s/_________

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Thompson v. C&H Sugar Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 18, 2015
No. 2:13-cv-1869-MCE-EFB PS (E.D. Cal. May. 18, 2015)
Case details for

Thompson v. C&H Sugar Co.

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE MAE THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. C&H SUGAR COMPANY, INC., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 18, 2015

Citations

No. 2:13-cv-1869-MCE-EFB PS (E.D. Cal. May. 18, 2015)