From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. Cain

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit
Mar 23, 2007
953 So. 2d 205 (La. Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2006 CA 1181.

March 23, 2007.

APPEAL FROM THE 19TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, IN AND FOR THE PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE, STATE OF LOUISIANA TRIAL COURT NO. 522,441, HONORABLE, JANICE CLARK JUDGE PRESIDING.

Keith Thompson, Angola, LA, Plaintiff/Appellant In Proper Person.

L. Bruce Dodd, Baton Rouge, LA, Attorney for Appellee, Richard Stalder.

Before: CARTER, C.J., WHIPPLE and McDONALD, JJ.


Plaintiff/Appellant, Keith Thompson, an inmate in the custody of the Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, seeks review of the district court judgment dismissing his suit with prejudice. The commissioner's August 3, 2005 screening report, adopted by the district court as reasons for its judgment, adequately explains the decision. The administrative record indicates that the penalty imposed was a change of housing assignment, which does not constitute a violation of a substantial right of the accused. Cf. Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 486, 115 S.Ct. 2293, 2301, 132 L.Ed.2d 418 (1995). Thus, there exists no ground for reversal or modification of the administrative decision. LSA-R.S. 15:1177A(9).

Thompson captioned his July 10, 2006, appellant brief as an "Application for Writ of Review." All concerns raised therein have been addressed on appeal.

The district court judgment is affirmed in accordance with Uniform Court of Appeal Rule 2-16.2.A(2), (5) and (6). Costs of this appeal are assessed to plaintiff/appellant, Keith Thompson.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Thompson v. Cain

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit
Mar 23, 2007
953 So. 2d 205 (La. Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

Thompson v. Cain

Case Details

Full title:Thompson v. Cain

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit

Date published: Mar 23, 2007

Citations

953 So. 2d 205 (La. Ct. App. 2007)

Citing Cases

Hill v. Dean

See Giles v. Cain, 762 So.2d 734, 737 (La.App. 1st Cir. 2000) (proper procedure was not followed in…