From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. Birkholz

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 22, 2024
2:22-05483 HDV (ADS) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2024)

Opinion

2:22-05483 HDV (ADS)

03-22-2024

STANLEY JOSEPH THOMPSON, Petitioner, v. BRIAN BIRKHOLZ, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

THE HONORABLE HERNAN D. VERA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody (Dkt. No. 1), Respondent's Motion to Dismiss the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Dkt. No. 9), the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 16), Petitioner's Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 24), and all the records and files herein. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation is accepted, (Dkt. No. 16);

2. The Petition is dismissed without prejudice (Dkt. No. 1); and

3. Judgment is to be entered accordingly.


Summaries of

Thompson v. Birkholz

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 22, 2024
2:22-05483 HDV (ADS) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2024)
Case details for

Thompson v. Birkholz

Case Details

Full title:STANLEY JOSEPH THOMPSON, Petitioner, v. BRIAN BIRKHOLZ, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Mar 22, 2024

Citations

2:22-05483 HDV (ADS) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2024)