Thompson et al. v. Murray

8 Citing cases

  1. Bruner v. Nordmeyer

    150 P. 159 (Okla. 1915)   Cited 10 times

    "Within the time allowed for bringing proceedings in error in this court, amendments to a petition in error are generally allowed as of course; thereafter matters of form, as a rule, may be corrected, but no new allegations of error can be made." In Thompson et al. v. Murray, 34 Okla. 521, 125 P. 1133, it appears that the motion for a new trial was overruled May 31, 1910, and the proceedings in error filed in this court May 29, 1911. On June 23d, defendant in error filed a motion to make the petition in error more definite and certain by stating the names of the plaintiffs in error on behalf of whom the petition in error was prosecuted, which motion was, on September 12th, sustained, showing that an amendment of such a character is permissible, although the above case was afterwards dismissed for failure to comply with the order of amendment and for other grounds.

  2. Deible et al. v. Union Iron Works

    139 P. 252 (Okla. 1914)

    Neither party has filed a brief, nor have they offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution, under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi). Streeter v. McCoy, 34 Okla. 490, 126 P. 216; Thompson v. Murray, 34 Okla. 521, 125 P. 1133; Streeter v. Huene, 34 Okla. 491, 126 P. 216 ; Reliable Ins. Co. v. Newcomber, 34 Okla. 759, 127 P. 260; M., O. G. Ry. Co. v. Johnson, 34 Okla. 816, 127 P. 386; First Nat. Bank v. Baldwin, 34 Okla. 825, 127 P. 260; Snow v. Frye, 34 Okla. 826, 127 P. 422. By the Court: It is so ordered.

  3. Wallingford v. Wood

    139 P. 252 (Okla. 1914)   Cited 3 times

    Neither party has filed a brief, nor have they offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi). Streeter v. McCoy, 34 Okla. 490, 126 P. 216; Thompson v. Murray, 34 Okla. 521, 125 P. 1133; Streeter v. Huene, 34 Okla. 491, 126 P. 216; Reliable Ins. Co. v. Newcomber, 34 Okla. 759, 127 P. 260; M., O. G. Ry. Co. v. Johnson, 34 Okla. 816, 127 P. 386; First Nat. Bank v. Baldwin, 34 Okla. 825, 127 P. 260; Snow v. Frye, 34 Okla. 826, 127 P. 422. By the Court: It is so ordered.

  4. Hill v. City of Kingfisher

    136 P. 775 (Okla. 1913)

    Neither party has filed a brief, nor have they offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 95 Pac. vi). Streeter v. McCoy, 34 Okla. 490, 126 P. 216; Thompson v. Murray, 34 Okla. 521, 125 P. 1133; Streeter v. Huene, 34 Okla. 491, 126 P. 216; Reliable Ins. Co. v. Newcomber, 34 Okla. 759, 127 P. 260; M., O. G. Ry. Co. v. Johnson, 34 Okla. 816, 127 P. 386; First Nat. Bank v. Baldwin, 34 Okla. 825, 127 P. 260; Snow v. Frye, 34 Okla. 826, 127 P. 422. By the Court: It is so ordered.

  5. Thompson v. Yount

    136 P. 592 (Okla. 1913)

    Neither party has filed a brief, nor have they offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 95 Pac. vi). Streeter v. McCoy, 34 Okla. 490, 126 P. 216; Thompson v. Murray, 34 Okla. 521, 125 P. 1133; Streeter v. Huene, 34 Okla. 491, 126 P. 216; Reliable Ins. Co. v. Newcomber, 34 Okla. 759, 127 P. 260; M., O. G. Ry. Co. v. Johnson, 34 Okla. 816, 127 P. 386; First Nat. Bank v. Baldwin, 34 Okla. 825, 127 P. 260; Snow v. Frye, 34 Okla. 826, 127 P. 422. By the Court: It is so ordered.

  6. Turner Hardware Co. v. John Deere Plow Co.

    136 P. 417 (Okla. 1913)   Cited 4 times

    In any event, it should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Streeter v. McCoy, 34 Okla. 490, 126 P. 216; Streeter v. Huene, 34 Okla. 491, 126 P. 216; Thompson v. Murray, 34 Okla. 521, 125 P. 1133; Reliable Ins. Co. v. Newcomber, 34 Okla. 759, 127 P. 260; M., O. G. R. Co. v. Johnson, 34 Okla. 816, 127 P. 386; First Nat. Bank v. Baldwin, 34 Okla. 825, 127 P. 260; Snow v. Frye, 34 Okla. 826, 127 P. 422. By the Court: It is so ordered.

  7. Newcomer et al. v. Freeman

    134 P. 1199 (Okla. 1913)

    Neither party has filed a brief, nor is there any excuse offered for their failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should therefore be dismissed, for want of prosecution, under rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi). Streeter v. McCoy, 34 Okla. 490, 126 P. 216; Streeter v. Huene, 34 Okla. 491, 126 P. 216; Thompson v. Murray, 34 Okla. 521, 125 P. 1133; Reliable Ins. Co. v. Newcomber, 34 Okla. 759, 127 P. 260; M., O. G. Ry. Co. v. Johnson, 34 Okla. 816, 127 P. 386; First Nat. Bank v. Baldwin, 34 Okla. 825, 127 P. 260; Snow v. Frye, 34 Okla. 826, 127 P. 422. By the Court: It is so ordered.

  8. Miller v. Williams

    132 P. 1191 (Okla. 1913)

    Neither party has filed a brief, nor is there any excuse offered for their failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should, therefore, be dismissed, for want of prosecution, under rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi); Streeter v. McCoy, 34 Okla. 490, 126 P. 216; Streeter v. Huene, 34 Okla. 491, 126 P. 216; Thompson v. Murray, 34 Okla. 521, 125 P. 1133; Reliable Ins. Co. v. Newcomber, 34 Okla. 759, 127 P. 260; O. G. Ry. Co. v. Johnson, 34 Okla. 816, 127 P. 422; First Nat. Bank v. Baldwin, 34 Okla. 825, 127 P. 260; Snow v. Frye, 34 Okla. 826, 127 P. 422. By the Court: It is so ordered.