From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Vais

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 21, 2003
301 A.D.2d 443 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

31

January 21, 2003.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered July 10, 2002, which denied defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint for lack of a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Brian J. Isaac, for plaintiffs-respondents.

Lawrence B. Goodman, for defendants-appellants.

Tom, J.P., Buckley, Rosenberger, Friedman, Marlow, JJ.


An issue of fact as to whether plaintiff sustained a serious injury as a result of the accident is raised by the affirmation of her treating physician quantifying limitations of motion revealed upon examination, correlating plaintiff's complaints of pain to disc herniations and spasm revealed in X-ray and MRI studies, and opining that such injuries were caused by the accident and are progressive and permanent (Toure v. Avis Rent A Car, 98 N.Y.2d 345, 350; see Newcomb v. Leslie, 300 A.D.2d 92, 2002 N.Y. App. Div LEXIS 12184).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Thomas v. Vais

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 21, 2003
301 A.D.2d 443 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Thomas v. Vais

Case Details

Full title:LILIETTE THOMAS, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. NIKOLAOS VAIS, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 21, 2003

Citations

301 A.D.2d 443 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
752 N.Y.S.2d 886