From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Thurston

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 9, 2020
18 CIVIL 4007 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 9, 2020)

Opinion

18 CIVIL 4007 (RA)

03-09-2020

CAZE D. THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. JEFF THURSTON, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion & Order dated March 6, 2020, Thurston's motion to dismiss the Third Amended Complaint is granted. Because the Court previously warned Plaintiff that his claims would be dismissed with prejudice and without leave to further re-plead if he chose to file an amended complaint, Plaintiff's complaint is now dismissed with prejudice. Furthermore, Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is denied; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

March 9, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Thomas v. Thurston

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 9, 2020
18 CIVIL 4007 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 9, 2020)
Case details for

Thomas v. Thurston

Case Details

Full title:CAZE D. THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. JEFF THURSTON, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Mar 9, 2020

Citations

18 CIVIL 4007 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 9, 2020)