Thomas v. Swarthout

Full title: LLOYD M. THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. G. SWARTHOUT, et al., Defendant.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 18, 2013

2:12-cv-2412 JFM P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 18, 2013)

Opinion

LLOYD M. THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. G. SWARTHOUT, et al., Defendant. No. 2:12-cv-2412 JFM P United States District Court, E.D. California. June 18, 2013

          ORDER

          EDMUND F. BRENNAN, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff, the only party who has appeared in this action to date, has consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). On May 28, 2013, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of that portion of this court's May 7, 2013 order (ECF No. 14) that found that plaintiff had failed to state a cognizable claim for relief in his amended complaint against Dr. Win.¹ Plaintiff has not shown grounds that require reconsideration of that order or that would support service on Dr. Win in this action. See Local Rule 230(j).

1 This individual is identified as Dr. Wynn in the court's May 7, 2013 order.

         Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's May 28, 2013 motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 17) is denied.