Thomas v. State

Full title: John Thomas, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Date published: Jun 9, 2015

463 S.W.3d 463 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. ED 101603

06-09-2015

John Thomas, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent.

Amanda Page Faerber, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant. Rachel S. Flaster, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Amanda Page Faerber, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant.

Rachel S. Flaster, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.

Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John Thomas appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 24.035¹ motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Brooks v. State, 242 S.W.3d 705, 708 (Mo.banc 2008). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1 All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P. 2013, unless otherwise noted.

--------