From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Mar 9, 2004
129 S.W.3d 426 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

No. ED 82928

March 9, 2004

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Honorable Julian Bush.

Scott Thompson, District Defender St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Evan J. Buchheim, Andrea K. Spillars, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Glenn A. Norton, P.J., Kathianne Knaup Crane, J. and Mary K. Hoff, J.



ORDER


Movant, Johnnie Thomas, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court's judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Thomas v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Mar 9, 2004
129 S.W.3d 426 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Thomas v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHNNIE THOMAS, Defendant/Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two

Date published: Mar 9, 2004

Citations

129 S.W.3d 426 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)