Opinion
No. 17-1876
09-28-2017
EDGAR THOMAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendant - Appellee.
Edgar Thomas, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:17-cv-01345-CMC) Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edgar Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Edgar Thomas appeals the district court's order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to dismiss Thomas' civil action without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and its order denying Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thomas v. South Carolina, No. 3:17-cv-01345-CMC (D.S.C. June 27 & July 19, 2017); see also Robinson v. Wix Filtration Corp., 599 F.3d 403, 407 (4th Cir. 2010) (reviewing Rule 59(e) denial for abuse of discretion). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED