From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. South and Associates

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Oct 28, 2003
115 S.W.3d 866 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. ED 81981

July 22, 2003 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied September 24, 2003 Application for Transfer Denied October 28, 2003

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Honorable Timothy J. Wilson.

Larry D. Coleman, Raytown, MO, for appellant.

Nancy M. Wilson, Kansas City, MO, Michael Graff, St. Louis, MO, for respondents.

Before Clifford H. Ahrens, P.J., William H. Crandall, Jr. and Lawrence E. Mooney, J.J.



ORDER


John M. Thomas appeals the court's judgment against him on his petition to quiet title and to set aside the foreclosure sale of his residential real estate. In his sole point on appeal, the appellant contends the trustee, South Associates, P.C., failed to satisfy the notice requirement of Section 443.325.3 RSMo. 2000.

We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the record on appeal. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo.banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Clifford H. Ahrens, P.J., William H. Crandall, Jr., J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J. concurring.


Summaries of

Thomas v. South and Associates

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Oct 28, 2003
115 S.W.3d 866 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Thomas v. South and Associates

Case Details

Full title:JOHN M. THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH AND ASSOCIATES, ET AL.…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Oct 28, 2003

Citations

115 S.W.3d 866 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)