From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Samuel

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 28, 2024
2:22-cv-03852-FLA (JC) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2024)

Opinion

2:22-cv-03852-FLA (JC)

03-28-2024

GREGORY THOMAS, Petitioner, v. DANNY SAMUEL, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

FERNANDO L. AENLLE-ROCHA United States District Judge.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Petition”) and all of the records herein, including the January 31, 2024 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report and Recommendation”). The court approves and accepts the Report and Recommendation.

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition is denied on its merits, the Motion to Stay is denied, this action is dismissed with prejudice, and Judgment be entered accordingly.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein on petitioner and counsel for respondent.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Thomas v. Samuel

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 28, 2024
2:22-cv-03852-FLA (JC) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2024)
Case details for

Thomas v. Samuel

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY THOMAS, Petitioner, v. DANNY SAMUEL, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Mar 28, 2024

Citations

2:22-cv-03852-FLA (JC) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2024)