From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Rahming

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Jan 28, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv470-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Jan. 28, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv470-MHT (WO)

01-28-2016

DANIEL K. THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. DR. RAHMING, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows:

(1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 31) is adopted.

(2) This lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice.

It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

This case is closed.

DONE, this the 28th day of January, 2016.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Thomas v. Rahming

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Jan 28, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv470-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Jan. 28, 2016)
Case details for

Thomas v. Rahming

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL K. THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. DR. RAHMING, et al., Defendants.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 28, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv470-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Jan. 28, 2016)