THOMAS v. PROJECT CURE, INC.

Full title: RANDOLPH THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. PROJECT CURE, INC., Defendant

Court: United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton

Date published: Jun 15, 2009

Case No. 3:08cv273 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 15, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 3:08cv273.

June 15, 2009

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. #12), AND OVERRULING DEFENDANT'S OBJECTIONS IN PART TO SAID JUDICIAL FILING (DOC. #14); DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING UNOBJECTED TO ORDER OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. #13); REMAINING CLAIMS SET FORTH

WALTER RICE, District Judge

Pursuant to the reasoning and citations of authority set forth by the United States Magistrate Judge, in her Report and Recommendations filed April 24, 2009 (Doc. #12), as well as upon a thorough de novo review of this Court's file and the applicable law, said Report and Recommendations are adopted in their entirety. The Defendant's Objections in part to said judicial filing (Doc. #14), directed only to that portion of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations which recommended overruling the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, as to Plaintiff's claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress, are overruled. Moreover, this Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's unobjected to Order of April 24, 2009 (Doc. #13).

As the result of the foregoing, the following claims remain to be litigated in this matter: the Plaintiff's claim under the American's With Disabilities Act and his claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress.