From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Progressive

United States District Court, Southern District of Alabama
Jan 25, 2024
CIV. ACT. 1:23-cv-225-TFM-B (S.D. Ala. Jan. 25, 2024)

Opinion

CIV. ACT. 1:23-cv-225-TFM-B

01-25-2024

MICHAEL THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. PROGRESSIVE, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

TERRY F. MOORER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On December 29, 2023, the Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendation which recommends the Defendant's motion to dismiss be granted in part, the Plaintiff's complaint be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and without leave to amend while the remainder of the Defendant's motion be denied as moot. See Doc. 13. No objections were filed and the timeframe has passed.

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 13) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Therefore, Defendant's motion to dismiss (Doc. 9) is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction while the remaining alternative arguments of the motion to dismiss are rendered moot. Further, the Court finds that it need not provide leave to amend because any amendment would be futile.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

Thomas v. Progressive

United States District Court, Southern District of Alabama
Jan 25, 2024
CIV. ACT. 1:23-cv-225-TFM-B (S.D. Ala. Jan. 25, 2024)
Case details for

Thomas v. Progressive

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. PROGRESSIVE, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Alabama

Date published: Jan 25, 2024

Citations

CIV. ACT. 1:23-cv-225-TFM-B (S.D. Ala. Jan. 25, 2024)