From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Price-Mart Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 20, 1999
267 A.D.2d 374 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Submitted November 17, 1999

December 20, 1999

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Price-Mart Inc. appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golia, J.), dated January 11, 1999, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Greenfield Hastings, Mineola, N.Y. (Charles T. Ruhl of counsel), for appellant.

Parker Waichman (DiJoseph, Portegello Schuster, P.C., New York, N. Y. [Arnold E. DiJoseph III] of counsel), for respondents.

LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, J.P., FRED T. SANTUCCI, MYRIAM J. ALTMAN WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellant.

The injured plaintiff fell when her foot became caught on the bottom of a clothes bin located at the top of two steps in the appellant's department store. The plaintiff had seen the bin when she entered the store and as she was walking up the steps. The record establishes that the bin did not present an inherently dangerous condition. Furthermore, since the bin was readily observable by the reasonable use of one's senses, the appellant had no duty to warn the injured plaintiff of the allegedly dangerous condition (see, Wint v. Fulton Street Art Gallery, 263 A.D.2d 541 [2d Dept., July 26, 1999]; O'Connor v. Katonah Museum of Art, 251 A.D.2d 561 ; Reuscher v. Pergament Home Ctrs., 247 A.D.2d 603;Sewer v. Fat Albert's Warehouse, 235 A.D.2d 414 ). Accordingly, the appellant's motion for summary judgment should have been granted.

BRACKEN, J.P., SANTUCCI, ALTMAN, FRIEDMANN, and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Thomas v. Price-Mart Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 20, 1999
267 A.D.2d 374 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Thomas v. Price-Mart Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPHINE THOMAS, et al., respondents, v. PRICE-MART INC., appellant, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 20, 1999

Citations

267 A.D.2d 374 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
699 N.Y.S.2d 729

Citing Cases

Stevens v. Lincoln Ctr. for the Performing Arts

At her deposition, plaintiff testified that, at the time of the accident, the lighting condition in Panevino…

Sandler v. Patel

Initially, we note that the defendant's contention that the defective condition was open and obvious was…