From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. New Jersey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE
Apr 26, 2012
Civil No. 11-2119 (RBK/KMW) (D.N.J. Apr. 26, 2012)

Opinion

Civil No. 11-2119 (RBK/KMW)

04-26-2012

HON. JAMES BRENT THOMAS, SR., on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated, and in the interest of the general public, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, HON. CHRIS CHRISTIE, and MR. or MRS. JOHN DOE, Defendants.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

(Doc. No. 5)

ORDER

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the motion of Hon. James Brent Thomas, Sr. ("Plaintiff"), on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, in the interest of the general public, for default judgment on Plaintiff's claim against the State of New Jersey, Hon. Chris Christie, and Mr. or Mrs. John Doe ("Defendants"); and

IT APPEARING TO THE COURT that, as Defendants' September 28, 2011 letter to the Court indicates, Defendants had not at that time been served with the summons and Complaint in this matter, Doc. No. 6; and

IT FURTHER APPEARING TO THE COURT that the Summons of Hon. Chris Christie and the State of New Jersey were each returned unexecuted on January 23, 2012, Doc. Nos. 9, 10; and

IT FURTHER APPEARING TO THE COURT that the Clerk has not entered Defendants' default in this matter; and

THE COURT NOTING that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(c)(1) provides that "[a] summons must be served with a copy of the complaint," Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(1); and

THE COURT NOTING FURTHER that "[w]hen a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party's default," Fed. R. Civ. P. 55; and

THE COURT FINDING that default judgment for Plaintiff is not proper under these circumstances;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for default judgment is DENIED.

________________________

ROBERT B. KUGLER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Thomas v. New Jersey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE
Apr 26, 2012
Civil No. 11-2119 (RBK/KMW) (D.N.J. Apr. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Thomas v. New Jersey

Case Details

Full title:HON. JAMES BRENT THOMAS, SR., on behalf of himself and all other similarly…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE

Date published: Apr 26, 2012

Citations

Civil No. 11-2119 (RBK/KMW) (D.N.J. Apr. 26, 2012)