From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Minglana

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 10, 2024
22-cv-04765-JST (N.D. Cal. Apr. 10, 2024)

Opinion

22-cv-04765-JST

04-10-2024

JASON LATRELL THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. V. MINGLANA, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

JON S. TIGAR. United States District Judge

Plaintiff filed the instant civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 10, 2024, the parties filed a stipulation for voluntary dismissal with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(ii), which states as follows:

Plaintiff Jason Latrell Thomas and Defendant Minglana have resolved this case in its entirety. Therefore, the parties stipulate to a dismissal of this action with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).
Each party shall bear its own litigation costs and attorney's fees.
It is so stipulated.
Dkt. No. 41. The stipulation is signed by both Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants. Id. Because this stipulation is a dismissal of this entire action, it also dismisses all claims against the remaining defendants and terminates all pending motions. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this entire action and Defendant are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Thomas v. Minglana

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 10, 2024
22-cv-04765-JST (N.D. Cal. Apr. 10, 2024)
Case details for

Thomas v. Minglana

Case Details

Full title:JASON LATRELL THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. V. MINGLANA, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Apr 10, 2024

Citations

22-cv-04765-JST (N.D. Cal. Apr. 10, 2024)