From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. McDaniel

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Sep 16, 2016
No. 70835 (Nev. Sep. 16, 2016)

Opinion

No. 70835

09-16-2016

CHRISTOPHER THOMAS, Petitioner, v. E.K. MCDANIEL; AND JAMES DZURENDA, Respondents.

cc: Christopher Thomas Attorney General/Carson City Eighth District Court Clerk


ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is a pro se petition for a "writ of mandamus or in alternative show cause." Petitioner challenges the way the Nevada Department of Corrections is deducting his statutory good-time credits. We have reviewed the documents submitted in this matter, and without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised therein, we decline to exercise original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.170. A challenge to the computation of time served must be raised in a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed in the district court in the first instance. NRS 34.724(2)(c); NRS 34.738(1).

Petitioner has recently raised the same issue in another petition for a writ of mandamus. See Thomas v. McDaniel, Docket No. 70301 (Order Denying Petition, June 16, 2016). Petitioner is cautioned that statutory credits may be forfeited if he files frivolous documents in a civil action. See NRS 209.451. Repeatedly raising the same issue constitutes frivolous action. Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Parraguirre

/s/_________, J.

Hardesty

/s/_________, J.

Pickering cc: Christopher Thomas

Attorney General/Carson City

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Thomas v. McDaniel

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Sep 16, 2016
No. 70835 (Nev. Sep. 16, 2016)
Case details for

Thomas v. McDaniel

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER THOMAS, Petitioner, v. E.K. MCDANIEL; AND JAMES DZURENDA…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Sep 16, 2016

Citations

No. 70835 (Nev. Sep. 16, 2016)