From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. McDaniel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 13, 2013
3:11-CV-0664-LRH (VPC) (D. Nev. Mar. 13, 2013)

Opinion

3:11-CV-0664-LRH (VPC)

03-13-2013

MARLO THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. E.K. McDANIEL, et al., Defendants.

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING


MINUTES OF THE COURT

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEPUTY CLERK: LISA MANN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:

Defendants filed a motion for leave to file Exhibit B under seal in support of opposition to motion for summary judgment (#45). No opposition was filed. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-2(d), the failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion shall constitute a consent to the granting of the motion. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that defendants' motion for leave to file Exhibit B under seal in support of opposition to motion for summary judgment (#44) is GRANTED. The exhibit (#46) is filed and shall remain under seal.

The Court notes that plaintiff has filed a motion to strike Exhibit B (#48). The Court will rule on the motion to strike after briefing has been completed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK

By: ____________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Thomas v. McDaniel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 13, 2013
3:11-CV-0664-LRH (VPC) (D. Nev. Mar. 13, 2013)
Case details for

Thomas v. McDaniel

Case Details

Full title:MARLO THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. E.K. McDANIEL, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 13, 2013

Citations

3:11-CV-0664-LRH (VPC) (D. Nev. Mar. 13, 2013)