From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. McBride

United States District Court, D. South Carolina
Jun 12, 2024
6:24-cv-563-RMG (D.S.C. Jun. 12, 2024)

Opinion

6:24-cv-563-RMG

06-12-2024

Michael Thomas, Plaintiff, v. Jeanette McBride, J. Newman, Defendants.


ORDER AND OPINION

Richard Mark Gergel, United States District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 18) recommending that the Court dismiss Plaintiff's complaint without prejudice, without leave to amend, and without service of process. After the Court initially adopted the R&R as the Order of the Court, (Dkt. No. 21), the Court received a request from Plaintiff seeking reconsideration and additional time to respond to the R&R. (Dkt. No. 24). The Court granted Plaintiff's request. (Dkt. No. 25). Plaintiff subsequently filed objections to the R&R. (Dkt. No. 28). The Court entered an order on June 12, 2024 denying the motion to reconsider.

The Court received a motion for an extension of time to file a response to the motion to reconsider on June 10, 2024. (Dkt. No. 30). The Court had already received Plaintiff's objection to the R & R and a final order has been issued. Consequently, Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to make another filing in this case (Dkt. No. 30) is denied. The Clerk is directed to accept no further filings from Plaintiff in this case.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Thomas v. McBride

United States District Court, D. South Carolina
Jun 12, 2024
6:24-cv-563-RMG (D.S.C. Jun. 12, 2024)
Case details for

Thomas v. McBride

Case Details

Full title:Michael Thomas, Plaintiff, v. Jeanette McBride, J. Newman, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, D. South Carolina

Date published: Jun 12, 2024

Citations

6:24-cv-563-RMG (D.S.C. Jun. 12, 2024)