From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Martin-Gibbons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Aug 26, 2020
19 CIVIL 7695 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 26, 2020)

Opinion

19 CIVIL 7695 (ER)

08-26-2020

SUZETTE THOMAS, TIESHA ORTIZ, J.O., and JOSE ORTIZ, Plaintiffs, v. PATRICIA L. MARTIN-GIBBONS, ESQ., Attorney, DANA J. WILSON-HAYNES, VINOLA WILSON, CARL JOSEPH HAYNES, ROBERT D. MULROY, Judge (Family), THE CHILDREN'S LAW CENTER, Legal Assistance, THE CITY OF NEW YORK, THE STATE OF NEW YORK, and MARTHA SCHNEIDERMAN, ESQ. Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated August 25, 2020, the Thomas complaint, 19cv7695 is dismissed in its entirety; The Thomas plaintiffs' state law claims are dismissed without prejudice subject to refiling in state court; All claims asserted on J.O.'s behalf are dismissed without prejudice to them being brought again if and when he is represented by counsel; All federal claims are dismissed with prejudice; In summary, all defendants' motions to dismiss are granted in their entirety; The Thomas plaintiffs may not file an amended complaint on these facts in this Court; accordingly, this case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

August 26, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Thomas v. Martin-Gibbons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Aug 26, 2020
19 CIVIL 7695 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 26, 2020)
Case details for

Thomas v. Martin-Gibbons

Case Details

Full title:SUZETTE THOMAS, TIESHA ORTIZ, J.O., and JOSE ORTIZ, Plaintiffs, v…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Aug 26, 2020

Citations

19 CIVIL 7695 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 26, 2020)